Debating Hate Crime: Language, Legislatures, and the Law in Canada (Law and Society)

Debating Hate Crime examines the language and argumentation used by parliamentarians, senators, and committee witnesses to debate Canadas hate-crime laws. These lively, and at times raucous, legislative debates and committee hearings reveal much about party politics, public policy, and social issues of the day, including citizenship, nationhood, and Canadian values. Drawing on discourse analysis, semiotics, and critical psychoanalysis, Allyson Lunny explores how the tropes, metaphors, and other linguistic signifiers used in these debates expose the particular concerns, trepidations, and anxieties of Canadian lawmakers and the expert witnesses called before their committees. In so doing, Lunny reveals and interrogates the meaning and social signification of the endorsement of, and resistance to, hate law. The result is a rich historical and analytical account of some of Canadas most passionate public debates on victimization, rightful citizenship, social threat, and moral erosion.